whoop, posted w/ the wrong subject. let's try this again...
i'm happy to work on the issue you raise there, *if* we can come to a clear consensus on whether this patch is core worthy or not. i have well over 100 hours invested in that patch--i really don't want to invest any more unless it's going to matter... :)
chad
>> On Jul 16, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Gerhard wrote:
>> As long as my remarks there aren't addressed, this patch gets a -1 from me.