Khalid-

I assumed so. In theory, database.pgsql.inc could intepret this line, but I also asume that using this syntax isn't a huge performance gain.

'Nuff said.

- Kem

From: "Khalid B" < kb@2bits.com>
Subject: Re: [development] MySQL Insert on Duplicate Key Update
To: development@drupal.org
Message-ID:
<4a9fdc630609060818m410e2f5eve53210f5f1c1287@mail.gmail.com >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

One word: PostgreSQL.

On 9/6/06, Ken Rickard < agentrickard@gmail.com> wrote:
> All-
>
> What is the opinion regarding the use of MySQL's syntax for:
>
> INSERT .... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/insert-on-duplicate.html
>
> I haven't seen any code that uses it. Is that habit or policy?
>
> - Ken Rickard
> agentrickard
>