Hello everyone,
I personally no longer feel this theme is up to the quality that it should be to be released as the replacement theme in core. There are too many tiny details that add up to "The Great Unpolished" theme.
A few times along the way, the theme was quite close, but needed a bit of nudging in the right direction. Now, it has faltered completely and is back to a sub-par theme.
What needs to happen is... Get either myself, or Steven, or some other themer from the community to take it the last final steps along the way. And we live with whatever that person does. I have the time to dedicate to it, and can spend 20/30hrs on this next week if someone allows me to do so.
Design by committee won't as the current status of the theme proves, work.
Please, let's get this right. Drupal deserves the best we can give it.
Trae
Note: This isn't in reply to Morbus... just a general comment on the thread and the theme.
> That's the type of feedback I'm looking for.
>
> It should be noted that this theme is being developed
> against HEAD. Just in case people are trying to run
> it with 4.7. Morbus, I'm guessing you are using HEAD
> but I just want to double check.
Actually, I'm using this for a brand new internal site which is 4.7.
You're thinking that the primary/secondary menus (and, more oddly, the
breadcrumb float?) aren't working as designed due to 4.7/HEAD? I'm
wondering: perhaps the theme is inheriting things, in HEAD, from the
default style.css, that aren't in drupal.css for 4.7? If that is the
case, I'd almost want to argue that a more portable theme would NOT
inherit anything from the defaults.
--
Morbus Iff ( I'd prefer my past to be multiple choice. )
Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779
Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org : morbus