I'll be +1 on code names, so long as one is borg :)
Robin
PS: codenames of all sorts, +1
"Ya'll hear that, we're usin' code names!"
- Raising Arizona
Richard, please just go with a +1 or -1 for the idea. While "silly" isn't exactly a bad form of expression if everyone used their personal opinion it could get ugly.
For the record, I'm +1 on code names. :)
Peace, love and bananas.TraeOn 9/19/06, Richard Archer < drupal.org@juggernaut.com.au> wrote:At 10:49 PM +0200 19/9/06, Derek Wright wrote:
>i get the sense i'm in the minority thinking that this late binding
>is a) unnecessary and b) costly. however, if i can't win that
>battle, i'll wholeheartedly support using code names instead of the
>terrible options we currently use ("cvs", "HEAD", etc).
Well, I'm right there with you.
Names for code are just plain silly.
...R.
--
Trae McCombs || http://occy.net/
Founder - Themes.org // Linux.com