Shouldn't have been drupal 5.1 named 5.0.1?

I wouldn't like to start (again?) a (previous?) discussion, but, when no number appears, anywhere in the world, in any field, a zero is understood. Which means, drupal 5 could have been named 5.0.0.0.0.0.0. This page it selfs  (http://drupal.org/node/93998) talks on a drupal 5.0 beta. The add project release form shows three fields for major, minor and patch-level numbers. This 5.1 is a new patched drupal, right? It should be 5.0.1, IMHO.


--

Robert Garrigós