So does that mean that we need to improve the internal docs?
Currently MENU_VISIBLE_IN_BREADCRUMB says "Internal menu flag -- menu item is visible in the breadcrumb"
-Randy
> I don't understand this. breadcrumbs have always been messedThe difference is that MENU_CALLBACK items are really just invisible
> up for MENU_CALLBACK items, but so here's the question: How
> do you get items to appear in the breadcrumb trail without
> making them MENU_NORMAL_ITEM and having them appear in navigation?
callbacks now; i.e., plain router items, not having any kind of menu link.
For edge-cases like the given example, in which you have a router path that
does not contain any dynamic path argument placeholder (%), you want to use
'type' => MENU_VISIBLE_IN_BREADCRUMB.
We actually discussed whether we need a new constant, but since a new
constant would be identical to MENU_VISIBLE_IN_BREADCRUMB, it would just
have another name.
sun