Ok, then can you please set the reply-to for the development and infrastructure lists back to sender.. :) On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 20:58 +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

Hi Darrel,

Please read this, and never ask this question again:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

Gabor

Darrel O'Pry wrote:

...

Can you set the list reply-to: to the list instead of the sender?

On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 10:34 +0100, Dries Buytaert wrote:

...

Hello world,

a new mailing list has been created: themes@drupal.org, a mailing list for theme developers and designers.

-- Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/

The difference is that with reply-to-list, you need to manually find the sender email address and then copy that to the to field, if you would like to have a personal reply. With reply-to-sender, you can either choose to reply or reply-all, it is built into the interface. It is just a matter of choosing where to click. Goba Eric Crump wrote:

Darrel,

It's a legitimate request, the fervor of the opposition notwithstanding. I've managed discussion lists since 1991 and have always used reply-to-list as the default. It works fine. Civilization has not crumbled. It's not appropriate in all cases. Neither is reply-to-sender infinitely superior, as some do claim. As long as subscribers know how the list works, either setting can work perfectly well.

--Eric Crump

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:20:33PM +0100, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

The difference is that with reply-to-list, you need to manually find the sender email address and then copy that to the to field, if you would like to have a personal reply. With reply-to-sender, you can either choose to reply or reply-all, it is built into the interface. It is just a matter of choosing where to click.

No. It's a matter of choosing your mail client. -- Piotrek irc: #debian.pl Mors Drosophilis melanogastribus!