Project: Drupal Version: 4.4.2 Component: other Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: Nick Nassar Reported by: Nick Nassar Updated by: Steven Status: patch How does this patch fit in with the aggregator/feed changes for extensible feeds, Steven Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 19, 2004 - 23:37 : Nick Nassar One major stumbling block we've come across in moving DownhillBattle.org from WordPress to Drupal is that WordPress supports RDF, RSS.92, RSS2, and ATOM feeds. We have lots of people using each of the different types of feeds, and we don't want to disrupt them. Drupal core only supports RSS.92, with a contributed module for ATOM support. Support for RSS2 and RDF feeds would make it much easier for many people to switch to Drupal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 20, 2004 - 20:03 : Nick Nassar The RSS.92 feed is located at node/feed. The custom module for ATOM feeds is locates them at atom/feed. If we follow the convention set by the atom feed module, the new feeds should go in rss2/feed and rdf/feed. The other logical option seems to be linking the new feeds at node/feed/rss2 and node/feed/rdf. Any preferences either way? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 25, 2004 - 17:58 : Nick Nassar Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/feeds.tar.gz (1.91 KB) Here are really basic RSS2 and RDF modules that link from /rss2 and /rdf ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 25, 2004 - 19:36 : erikhopp is this patch applied? fyi: if you add a patch to an open issue, you should mark it status:patch, then when it is approved, the approver sets it to status:fixed. sorry if it actually is applied, but i don't see any indication that it is on the devel list... i hope the downhillbattle.org stuff is going well! erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 26, 2004 - 06:27 : Anonymous Are these module suitable for CVS version? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ August 27, 2004 - 01:06 : Anonymous I found these module can't pass the Feed Validator, problems are on the time tag, have futher pattch more? thansk. I really think it should be include in 4..5 core. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ September 1, 2004 - 23:13 : Nick Nassar Changing status to active ------------------------------------------------------------------------ September 2, 2004 - 01:13 : Nick Nassar Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/feeds.tar_0.gz (1.95 KB) The feeds now pass the Feed Validator. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ September 2, 2004 - 02:29 : drumm I have to say -1. Sorry I haven't been able to be more involved in this issue, but I can tell you what I don't like about the current implmentation: -makes 2 places to maintain code (node views and feeds) into four -makes 2 levels of feeds, core node functionality and addon modules -the feeds still aren't extensible (although that could be another issue) -this only adds feeds for the front page when there are many more feeds -its not for drupal cvs Having said that, this code would be perfect in the contributinos CVS repository in sandbox/yourusername/... It should be published, but I think we can do better before Drupal 4.6 (most realistic place to target this functionality for Drupal core), so it doesn't need to be a full module. I will have a chance to describe my ideas in some detail on the drupal-devel mailing list at some point, maybe sooner if I get poked enough. -- View: http://drupal.org/node/10203 Edit: http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/10203