What is a contribution?
I am curious about the requirement of being a contributor to get on the Services page of the Handbook. To quote: "This section lists some of the people and organizations providing Drupal-related services including design, installation, custom Drupal software development, training, support and consulting services. We only list individuals and companies that have contributed to Drupal." But there is nothing on what a contribution can be. Is it a judgement call or are there actually guidelines? Does it have to be a core contribution? do patches count? third party modules? patches to third party modules? documentation? finanancial? handbook pages? Should not the actual contribution to Drupal be listed on the description page of the company or individual? Can someone not only answer these questions but also make the according changes to the page? Carl Mc Dade ____________________________ Web Developer Dataföreningen i Sverige AB www.d4d.se www.dfs.se --------------------------------- How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messengers low PC-to-Phone call rates.
On 8/11/06, Carl Mc Dade <carl_mcdade@yahoo.com> wrote:
I am curious about the requirement of being a contributor to get on the Services page of the Handbook. To quote:
"This section lists some of the people and organizations providing Drupal-related services including design, installation, custom Drupal software development, training, support and consulting services. We only list individuals and companies that have contributed to Drupal." But there is nothing on what a contribution can be. Is it a judgement call or are there actually guidelines? Does it have to be a core contribution? do patches count? third party modules? patches to third party modules? documentation? finanancial? handbook pages?
It is a judgement call, and it is some combination of the above. One patch might not be enough (i.e. I made this patch just to get on the list), but on the other hand, if you signed up to the site, figured out the process for adding a patch, and saw the patch through until it got committed to core It's usually pretty easy to tell what a contribution is. Should not the actual contribution to Drupal be listed on the description
page of the company or individual?
Sure...it's a matter of being difficult to cover in many cases -- i.e. captureing ALL the contributions of a particular individual/company (does me writing this email to you count?). It's pretty easy to click on the user account of a person, see how long they've been around, the list of CVS comments, hit "track" and see discussions they've been involved in, etc. Can someone not only answer these questions but also make the according
changes to the page?
Probably better covered on in the Documentation list, in terms of discussing/making written changes. And my guess is that there probably isn't a lot of appetite for fiddling with that page. Of course, you're welcome to suggest a re-write, file it as a Documentation issue, and bring it up on docs. -- Boris Mann Vancouver 778-896-2747 San Francisco 415-367-3595 Skype borismann http://www.bryght.com
On 8/12/06, Carl Mc Dade <carl_mcdade@yahoo.com> wrote:
I am curious about the requirement of being a contributor to get on the Services page of the Handbook. To quote:
"This section lists some of the people and organizations providing Drupal-related services including design, installation, custom Drupal software development, training, support and consulting services. We only list individuals and companies that have contributed to Drupal."
But there is nothing on what a contribution can be. Is it a judgement call or are there actually guidelines?
It is not something that can easily be measured, but easy to recognize. Something that is considered tangible to the project and/or community.
Does it have to be a core contribution?
No.
do patches count?
Yes.
third party modules?
Yes.
patches to third party modules?
Yes.
documentation?
Yes.
finanancial?
Yes.
handbook pages?
Yes. One instance of one of the above is not enough. How much is enough? Not easy to tell, but easy to recognize.
Should not the actual contribution to Drupal be listed on the description page of the company or individual?
It is up to the company/person to list their own contribution. It is fairly easy to do so by linking to the drupal.org people who constitute the company. It is then easy for others to check the CVS commits, track posts, ...etc.
participants (3)
-
Boris Mann -
Carl Mc Dade -
Khalid B