We have now generated test coverage reports, which are publically available at http://coverage.cwgordon.com/. If you would like the raw data for manipulation, it is available at http://coverage.cwgordon.com/cc.tgz. For those of you who don't want to click links, the essence of the matter is: we have 66.68% test coverage with our current tests. However, we can also learn a lot from these reports, such as which files and functions we need to pay more attention to in our testing. Hopefully this report will prove useful! :) -Charlie
How did you make these reports? ----- "Charlie Gordon" <cwgordon7@cwgordon.com> wrote:
We have now generated test coverage reports, which are publically available at http://coverage.cwgordon.com/. If you would like the raw
data for manipulation, it is available at http://coverage.cwgordon.com/cc.tgz. For those of you who don't want to click links, the essence of the matter is: we have 66.68% test coverage with our current tests. However, we can also learn a lot from these reports, such as which files and functions we need to pay more attention to in our testing. Hopefully this report will prove useful! :)
-Charlie
David Timothy Strauss wrote:
How did you make these reports?
I've actually released the source code I used in a module; it can be found at http://drupal.org/project/code_coverage. Basically, it relies on xdebug to generate the code coverage data, and then just stores and processes it in a way that's meaningful.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Charlie Gordon <cwgordon7@cwgordon.com> wrote:
David Timothy Strauss wrote:
How did you make these reports?
I've actually released the source code I used in a module; it can be found at http://drupal.org/project/code_coverage. Basically, it relies on xdebug to generate the code coverage data, and then just stores and processes it in a way that's meaningful.
Grm, have you seen: http://drupal.org/node/260032 ?? Gabor
Gábor Hojtsy wrote:
Grm, have you seen: http://drupal.org/node/260032 ?? Gabor
Yes, I have, and I actually re-used some of that code. A lot of it had to be thrown out, though, because it was kind of badly written. -Charlie
OK, great, it would be great to follow up on the issue and close it then. Gabor On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Charlie Gordon <cwgordon7@cwgordon.com> wrote:
Gábor Hojtsy wrote:
Grm, have you seen: http://drupal.org/node/260032 ?? Gabor
Yes, I have, and I actually re-used some of that code. A lot of it had to be thrown out, though, because it was kind of badly written.
-Charlie
participants (3)
-
Charlie Gordon -
David Timothy Strauss -
Gábor Hojtsy