Drupal 5 incremental release?
Please file detailed and specific bugs against 5.x if any APIs have changed which break contributed modules. This should not happen.
That's fine, but wouldn't it be more expedient to open the scrutiny of the api's to the entire Drupal community? Any one individual (or even a handful of individuals) is going to have a more limited amount of time to research, document, and fix the existing issues with Drupal 5.x-dev than if the entire Drupal 5 user base is looking at things. I guess I don't understand the reasons for not releasing something at this point. Considering that 5.1 was released within 2 weeks of the 5.0 release, at time frame which could almost be considered as "concurrent" with the 5.0release given the larger perspective of time, it's not much of a stretch to say that the 5.0 branch has never really been updated since being released (to quibble I guess the more technically correct term is that it's been "hardly" updated). - Caleb
On Jul 20, 2007, at 8:53 PM, Caleb Gilbert wrote:
That's fine, but wouldn't it be more expedient to open the scrutiny of the api's to the entire Drupal community?
Neither the issue queue nor the dev snapshot release are kept secret from anyone.
Any one individual (or even a handful of individuals) is going to have a more limited amount of time to research, document, and fix the existing issues with Drupal 5.x-dev than if the entire Drupal 5 user base is looking at things.
Then people who care should look at things. Please help.
I guess I don't understand the reasons for not releasing something at this point.
We're working on a release. No one's fundamentally opposed to another point release, it's just a question of resources of the people working on the release and the quantity and quality of the people helping. We can't put out another "stable" release that we expect 1000s of Drupal sites to upgrade to if there are important, known bugs (like changing the stable API in some way that breaks some contrib modules).
Considering that 5.1 was released within 2 weeks of the 5.0 release, at time frame which could almost be considered as "concurrent" with the 5.0 release given the larger perspective of time, it's not much of a stretch to say that the 5.0 branch has never really been updated since being released (to quibble I guess the more technically correct term is that it's been "hardly" updated).
There you are wrong. Look at the CVS activity in the core repository between the DRUPAL-5-1 tag and the end of the DRUPAL-5 branch. It's already changed a lot. A number of bugs, large and small, have been fixed. But, we can't break anyone's site with the next release, so we have to give it a lot of care before we ship it. In fact, I'd argue that another stable release months after the initial new version is more difficult and requires more care than a new X.0 release. When 6.0 comes out, only a handful of sites will immediately switch to it, and only a (hopefully large) fraction of contribs will be ported to it. 5.2 on the other hand will immediately be put into action by a clear majority of all Drupal sites in the world. As with every new release of core, if you want it sooner, then help make it happen. The issue queue is usually where you can be most effective. Darren already posted a useful link to the issue queue, please read the comments, test the patches, and provide your input. You can always search for 5.x-specific bugs in the queue, and review, test, and/or provide patches where needed. Cheers, -Derek (dww)
Caleb Gilbert wrote:
Please file detailed and specific bugs against 5.x if any APIs have changed which break contributed modules. This should not happen.
That's fine, but wouldn't it be more expedient to open the scrutiny of the api's to the entire Drupal community? Any one individual (or even a handful of individuals) is going to have a more limited amount of time to research, document, and fix the existing issues with Drupal 5.x-dev than if the entire Drupal 5 user base is looking at things.
Well, Drumm asked you to do just this. Submitting an issue is a completely open process.
I guess I don't understand the reasons for not releasing something at this point.
Well, you provided the reason yourself, so honestly I don't understand this sentence. You said the current 5.x-dev breaks with contributed modules. But you don't see a reason not to release it?! Gabor
participants (3)
-
Caleb Gilbert -
Derek Wright -
Gabor Hojtsy