13 Jul
2007
13 Jul
'07
10:35 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The subject is from the CREATE TABLE node statement which we execute at install time. Is there a specific reason to use type(4)? Shouldn't we use type? This is at least inconsistent as use the full type for node_status_type. Cheers, Gerhard -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlzlHfg6TFvELooQRAkERAKDMXGqHTsxM/gyOoGMGxLsom/6oogCgtKre kUfPKNf84pk7EZ4xAWAJbws= =G8B4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 Jul
13 Jul
2:14 p.m.
New subject: [development] KEY node_type (type(4)),
Is there a specific reason to use type(4)? Shouldn't we use type?
FYI, I have no idea why it is this way and see no reason no to use the full type field in the index. The D6 schema preserves the type(4) index only because it was present in D5. Thanks, Barry
6918
Age (days ago)
6918
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Barry Jaspan -
Gerhard Killesreiter