[drupal-devel] [feature] Provide a 70x5 textarea in which I can a write a block's "visbility check" using Drupal's APIs.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: chx Status: patch Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. chx
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: chx Status: patch Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description. chx Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: chx Status: patch Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_1.patch (3.51 KB) Rewording following advice from Steef and JonBob. chx Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:13 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: Dries Status: patch This looks _really_ handy to me. +1 from me. In order not to confuse the average user, I suggest to remove the 'node-type specific visibility settings'. Like that, we cater for the most common/popupalar functionality. Anything less popular can be implemented using PHP. This is a good example of 'less is more'. Dries Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 15:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 15:13 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 16:09 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_1.patch (3.51 KB) Rewording following advice from Steef and JonBob.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: chx Status: patch Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_2.patch (9.68 KB) I deleted types. chx Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:13 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 15:09 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_1.patch (3.51 KB) Rewording following advice from Steef and JonBob. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 17:10 : Dries This looks _really_ handy to me. +1 from me. In order not to confuse the average user, I suggest to remove the 'node-type specific visibility settings'. Like that, we cater for the most common/popupalar functionality. Anything less popular can be implemented using PHP. This is a good example of 'less is more'.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: budda Status: patch Probably a little confusing to non-coders but it will solve the problem and copy n paste code can be provided via drupal.org for users. Good stuff. +1 from me. budda Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 13:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 13:13 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 14:09 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_1.patch (3.51 KB) Rewording following advice from Steef and JonBob. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 16:10 : Dries This looks _really_ handy to me. +1 from me. In order not to confuse the average user, I suggest to remove the 'node-type specific visibility settings'. Like that, we cater for the most common/popupalar functionality. Anything less popular can be implemented using PHP. This is a good example of 'less is more'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 27, 2005 - 06:10 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_2.patch (9.68 KB) I deleted types.
Issue status update for http://drupal.org/node/21353 Project: Drupal Version: cvs Component: block.module Category: feature requests Priority: normal Assigned to: chx Reported by: chx Updated by: tostinni Status: patch "Probably a little confusing to non-coders but it will solve the problem and copy n paste code can be provided via drupal.org for users. " Maybe a handbook page could be created with some examples Dries provided on the mailing list (and others code of course) and make a link in the block_help ? tostinni Previous comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 08:08 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php.patch (3.37 KB) Dries, you asked for this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 08:13 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_0.patch (3.38 KB) Escaped the < and > signs in the description. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 09:09 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_1.patch (3.51 KB) Rewording following advice from Steef and JonBob. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 26, 2005 - 11:10 : Dries This looks _really_ handy to me. +1 from me. In order not to confuse the average user, I suggest to remove the 'node-type specific visibility settings'. Like that, we cater for the most common/popupalar functionality. Anything less popular can be implemented using PHP. This is a good example of 'less is more'. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 27, 2005 - 01:10 : chx Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/block_php_2.patch (9.68 KB) I deleted types. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ April 28, 2005 - 08:05 : budda Probably a little confusing to non-coders but it will solve the problem and copy n paste code can be provided via drupal.org for users. Good stuff. +1 from me.
participants (4)
-
budda -
chx
-
Dries
-
tostinni