Re: [development] Administration page patch committed
Have you guys had a look at the SandsCSS theme? http://drupal.org/node/57629 I'm no CSS expert, so I don't know if it's all that under the hood, but it does make for a prettier Bluemarine. MichelleC On 8/3/2006 1:50:40 PM, Neil Drumm (drumm@delocalizedham.com) wrote:
Bluemarine refresh: 1. Replace the flat Druplicon default icon with the cell-shaded one. 2. Throw in a tableless layout. 3. Saturate the light blue colors a bit. 4. Add whitespace. 5. Improve the fonts a bit. 6. Repeat in 1-2 years or as needed.
Doh, this theme is copyleft licensed... Some portions of this website's design are part of the Sands theme for Drupal, which is copyleft (c) 2005-2006 Samat Jain. All rights reserved. This theme should change license, or should be removed from the Drupal repository, since it does not comply to our policies. It should be GPL to stay in contrib. It definitely is not core compatible license wise. Gabor On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Michelle Cox wrote:
Have you guys had a look at the SandsCSS theme? http://drupal.org/node/57629 I'm no CSS expert, so I don't know if it's all that under the hood, but it does make for a prettier Bluemarine.
MichelleC
On 8/3/2006 1:50:40 PM, Neil Drumm (drumm@delocalizedham.com) wrote:
Bluemarine refresh: 1. Replace the flat Druplicon default icon with the cell-shaded one. 2. Throw in a tableless layout. 3. Saturate the light blue colors a bit. 4. Add whitespace. 5. Improve the fonts a bit. 6. Repeat in 1-2 years or as needed.
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Doh, this theme is copyleft licensed...
Some portions of this website's design are part of the Sands theme for Drupal, which is copyleft (c) 2005-2006 Samat Jain. All rights reserved.
This theme should change license, or should be removed from the Drupal repository, since it does not comply to our policies. It should be GPL to stay in contrib. It definitely is not core compatible license wise. Copyleft isn't a license. It's a buzzword used by the GNU folks as a catch-all for licenses that meet their goals, which obviously includes the GPLs. A quick look at the CVS repository for it shows that there is no license.txt file, and the few files that I checked have no copyright notice. So I think it's clear that if any license applies, it will be the GPL as required by Drupal's upload policy.
Gary
Since Copyleft does not specify the GPL license explicitly, it can be understood differently. The output of the theme should not suggest otherwise. A GPL License.txt is added by default to project downloads, go try it. Gabor On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Gary Feldman wrote:
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Doh, this theme is copyleft licensed...
Some portions of this website's design are part of the Sands theme for Drupal, which is copyleft (c) 2005-2006 Samat Jain. All rights reserved.
This theme should change license, or should be removed from the Drupal repository, since it does not comply to our policies. It should be GPL to stay in contrib. It definitely is not core compatible license wise. Copyleft isn't a license. It's a buzzword used by the GNU folks as a catch-all for licenses that meet their goals, which obviously includes the GPLs. A quick look at the CVS repository for it shows that there is no license.txt file, and the few files that I checked have no copyright notice. So I think it's clear that if any license applies, it will be the GPL as required by Drupal's upload policy.
Gary
participants (3)
-
Gabor Hojtsy -
Gary Feldman -
Michelle Cox