If I didn't have access to a local company I would probably use Slicehost.

Ryan LeTulle


bayousoft -twitter








On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Ryan LeTulle <bayousoft@gmail.com> wrote:
I've also not used Amazon.  My cloud experience is with a local company and there pricing is *not* based on time.

Ryan LeTulle


bayousoft -twitter








On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Ryan LeTulle <bayousoft@gmail.com> wrote:
For me there are other costs associated with dedicated like backing up, co-location fees etc.  These are what drive the cost up.

Ryan LeTulle


bayousoft -twitter








On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Ryan LeTulle <bayousoft@gmail.com> wrote:
Nope I read and understood:

I've not seen what you describe occur in practice.  In my experience the costs of a dedicated server are much higher than cloud.  I run both.

Ryan LeTulle


bayousoft -twitter








On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Earnie Boyd <earnie@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Ryan LeTulle wrote:
> IMO A huge benefit is being able to upsize memory and processor only when
> necessary.
>
> That is not possible with a dedicated server.

You must not have read:

>> they can afford it.  The two dedicated servers can be cloud enabled for
>> their use.

If the cost of the cloud service is by time then it can quickly become
more than the cost of a dedicated server depending on use of course.
But if you're not using it much then you don't need cloud services
anyway and if you are using it much then two dedicated servers that act
as your dedicated cloud is more beneficial.

--