I have a site in Drupal 4.7 (blog.shostak.net) where the images just stopped working - the ones that are there are fine, but I can't add new ones, I just get tons of errors. On another site I fixed that by resetting to defaults, but I don't want to reset the image sizes to default there. I've left it alone for now because I planned to upgrade to D5 and change the theme anyway.

On another site (urbanorganic.jeangazis.com), which is a multisite install, I have images there but can't add new ones. The files are there, but the images don't appear. If I use image import, it duplicates the preview and thumbnails. Something is getting messed up in the path.

I also have a site where I really need it to be easy for users to upload photos, and it doesn't look like imagefield and imagecache are the answer to that, either. I might try one of the gallery mods. I've only used the gallery that comes with image.

So it seems like the module has a reputation for being buggy, and is going wrong for me in more than one way, so I'm interested in alternatives. I'd prefer that they don't require custome theming, though, because I haven't gotten into that yet.

Jean

On 8/28/07, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail@webthatworks.it> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:05:23 -0400
"Jean Gazis" <jgazis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello helpful people!

> I have been using the image and image assist modules for images on
> my sites. I've had some problems with them, and when I looked at
> the issues list for image I was not thrilled, there are a lot of
> them. It seems like everyone in the local user group (NYC) uses CCK
> imagefield with imagecache instead for their sites. I'm thinking I
> should just go ahead and switch. What's the best way to go about
> it? Will uninstalling the modules cause further problems? Will I
> have to recreate all the image content?

> I have simply images in posts, and some image galleries.

Very recently I've installed gallery for gallery2 and Image.
The former because gallery gives a lot of options for uploading
images, because it support video and embedded content from other
sites (flickr, youtube).

I used Image on my personal site because I need a very clean method
to build up simple galleries.

I find that tweaking the layout of Image is much easier than tweaking
gallery + gallery2.

What do you think the shortcomings of Image are?

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it

--
[ Drupal support list | http://lists.drupal.org/ ]



--
Jean Gazis
www.jeangazis.com
www.boxofrain.us

"Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it." - André Gide