Well, They are friends of mine, Garrett, Tuomas, Ryan, and Jakub (and others) but aside from being personal friends, I don't know how much weight I hold in trying to sway them on changing the license. I asked in #tango and was greeted by chirping crickets. :)
I'm sure a lot of this is due to the fact they are like, working and stuff.
I just don't think we should be so quick to change the icons. I personally don't even know where these are being used??? I know I've used them in a few other projects, but haven't heard about any licensing issues.
Where are these icons in questioned being used?
Trae
On 5/30/06, grohk <grohk@code0range.net
> wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Trae McCombs wrote:
> It's such a shame to see such a great base of icons shunned due to
> licensing
> issues. I personally know the people who work on these icons, and the
> intent is for them to be used by the community. :/
Actually, I just thought of an option #3. Trea, you are on the about
page of the Tango project, so maybe you could ask them if there might be
a way to dual-license these icons?
As many of you know there was a similar licensing issue with the Mollio
template [1], which was resolved by Mollio releasing their fine template
under the GPL in parallel with the original CC Attribution.
Think that would work?
[1] http://www.mollio.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEfK+tO+lwfsap+f0RAuQ7AKCgc9wzbd3NALcn7hNBcM2HLPZjyACghEu6
G0zuLBM2Vx3FrDy9Wy15es4=
=bMTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
themes mailing list
themes@drupal.org
http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes
--
Trae McCombs || http://occy.net/
Founder - Themes.org
// Linux.com
CivicSpaceLabs - http://civicspacelabs.com/