On 5/30/06, grohk <grohk@code0range.net> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Trae McCombs wrote:
> I am in favor of the 2nd.  I don't see the problem behind the CC license.
> It's non-code.  Sure, I'm all for GPL when it comes to source code, but
> when
> it's an image or document or whatever, what does it matter?

It does matter, since there are a number of CC licenses to chose from
and changing the policy to allow for these would be non-trivial.  The
license in question has an attribution clause which can be interpreted
in several ways I guess, but in my mind would force each site that uses
the icons to attribute the original author.  The GPL makes no such demand.

I am in favor of option 1.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEfKZlO+lwfsap+f0RAoL5AJ9Joo99tmzQjqQ8A1FmIndFuWEOxgCfeXRZ
PhfHkMc+1AEx8eZvdqiRkbo=
=pHLs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
themes mailing list
themes@drupal.org
http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/themes