[consulting] Consulting directory

[sime]

I agree with your points. I"ve obviously mis-used the term 
"accreditation". No matter, this type of stuff is off the radar so I'll 
save it for a better time.
.s

Sami Khan wrote:

>Well,
>
>With the amount of work available and the money attached with that  
>work, I really don't see the justification of institutionalizing  
>Drupal. But if the developers feel that its beneficial, then why not.  
>I don't want to, and will not pay for any services as such. There is  
>in general minimal gain and a good amount of loss of freedom in  
>anything that goes the path of accreditation or creating any sort of  
>bureaucracy around Drupal. Not to mention increasing administrative  
>costs of simply maintaining such a body, which will be paid for by the  
>members, more money out of their pockets. What will they gain? Well,  
>perhaps work for some people, but Drupal.org forums already serve well  
>enough for that. In terms of assurance of the people who are hiring  
>these developers, well get references, and talk to real people and who  
>should be set.
>
>Regards,
>Sami
>
>Quoting sime <info at urbits.com>:
>
>  
>
>>A service I would like is accreditation. But I assume this is not phase
>>one. :-)
>>_______________________________________________
>>consulting mailing list
>>consulting at drupal.org
>>http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>consulting mailing list
>consulting at drupal.org
>http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>
>
>  
>