[consulting] copyright policies

[Kevin Amerson]

Then a few things could happen:

1. The end product would be owned by Ford, and would be patentable
2. Or... the governing open source license and specifics would deem that the
product would have to be open source (currently depending on how its
distributed through a loophole in one of the available open source
liecenses)

Either way, as a contracted developer, you don't own any of it.  Unless, of
course, you somehow convinced your client to sign something they shouldn't
have.

Kevin

On Jan 25, 2008 11:31 AM, Katherine Lawrence <katherine at pingv.com> wrote:

>  What if you used open source to build the assembly line so that Henry
> Ford did not own any patents?
>
>
>
> *From:* consulting-bounces at drupal.org [mailto:
> consulting-bounces at drupal.org] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Amerson
> *Sent:* Friday, January 25, 2008 10:19 AM
> *To:* A list for Drupal consultants and Drupal service/hosting providers
> *Subject:* Re: [consulting] copyright policies
>
>
>
>
>
> Ex. If Henry Ford came to me asked me to build a factory to build his
> cars quickly. Then I used my skill to build an assembly line. Then the
> Wright Brothers came to be and asked for me to build a factory for
> their planes. I would build an assembly line.
>
> I don't see any issue here because the tool was created by me and the
> overall product is different. If someone hires me to build a  new kind
> of social networking site that has never been done before and I create
> a super fast data access library while building that site, that tool
> is mine and is my creative work. I would not re-create the social
> networking idea that was the final product but I would re-use my code
> on the next pizza site I built.
>
>
> If you did this Henry Ford would sue you.  The reason being he owns the
> patent on the assembly line, he owns all the machines and patents on all
> those machines.   In fact this  is exactly what gave Ford an advantage for
> so many years.  When you were working for Ford in this scenario, everything
> you did, every idea you came up with belonged to him.
>
> This thread  is amazing to me.   I've been on both sides of the fence, and
> you have  to come to the realization that if you're hired as a contractor to
> build something for someone else, then they own it, if you're a full time
> employee and you invent something cool while on the job for them, they own
> it!!!  they own all of it. If they agree to license it under the GPL then it
> should be made publicly available, but any client willing license part of
> that back to the developer or the developer using any part of it for their
> own personal gain through reselling it and charging more money for more
> custom development of it is just crazy, and quite possibly illegal.
>
> I understand that many of you are competing with offshore companies, you
> will do yourselves a favor to keep this in mind, that for a US based company
> to drag an offshore company through litigation is quite expensive (so they
> just won't do it), its much less expensive for a US based company to drag a
> US based company through litigation.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/consulting/attachments/20080125/1280c968/attachment.htm