[consulting] Cleaning Up After Bad Developers
Brian Vuyk
brian at brianvuyk.com
Tue Mar 24 14:00:50 UTC 2009
Sam,
I agree with most of what you said. However, where I see the problems is
when the newbie developer takes on a job considerably above his skill
level. It happens, and it's not always intentional - developer may not
even recognize that a job is over his head until he is in the middle of it.
Brian
Sam Cohen wrote:
> It seems to me there is room for different levels of expertise here.
> There are many small nonprofits and businesses that don't have the
> $100 to $150 an hour for a developers.
>
> Let's keep in mind, there are a lot of great sites out their that
> didn't use a developer at all.
>
> Many folks without a budget try doing it themselves, but get stuck.
> So they hire a newbie, someone who know a bit more than them to help
> them out. Yes, that person might not do things the right way, but if
> they did, they wouldn't be an inexpensive developer.
>
> As long as the developer working on the site doesn't claim to have
> expertise he doesn't have and isn't charging $125 an hour for $30 an
> hour work, I think there's room for those type of folks -- with simple
> sites with minor customization.
>
> When I client comes to me, I'm very open about that. I tell them they
> can find people cheaper than me and they can also find people more
> expensive -- and there are pros and cons with any choice.
>
> Those building a site need to do their homework. If they're paying
> $25 an hour for a developer and others are charging 5 times that, they
> need to realize there are things they aren't getting.
>
> But I do think what Drupal is lacking is not accreditation, but an
> easy way for those who do try and customize Drupal to quickly
> familiarize themselves with the best practices for doing so.
>
> The best I've found is the book Drupal Pro Development, highly
> recommended to any new developer.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, William Smith
> <william.darren at gmail.com <mailto:william.darren at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> In addition to this, I often encounter the opposite as well - 'value'
> programmers (usually general PHP coders with limited Drupal
> experience) who made a mess of a site by not knowing how to do things
> the Drupal way. Javascript included in all manner of creative ways
> and without making use of jQuery where it would be sensible to do so,
> modules hacked and re-hacked where there were simple theme overrides
> or custom module solutions, etc.., etc..
>
> It drives me absolutely crazy when a client (who would initially
> probably have thought me expensive) has been lead to be believe that
> they are getting a 'good deal', only to have to pay someone else (at
> that 'expensive' rate) to come in and fix all the problems the cheap
> developer has left in their wake. (Usually right before they bail on
> the project because they are in over their head).
>
> I've never used oDesk to find work, but I did join up in order to take
> the Drupal qualifications test that they have for a spin. I'm
> generally in favor of this sort of thing at this point. Too many
> people knowing just enough about Drupal to make a real mess for the
> people who've hired them.
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Steve Kessler
> <skessler at denverdataman.com <mailto:skessler at denverdataman.com>>
> wrote:
> > I am working on a couple sites right now where there has been poor
> > development by other developers, egregious pricing, lack of
> communication
> > and poor service because the sites were too small for these shops.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org <mailto:consulting at drupal.org>
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>
More information about the consulting
mailing list