[consulting] REVISED RFP FOR DRUPAL DEVELOPER

[Matt Chapman]

I didn't perceive or intend any "skewering." Seemed to me it was
consultants offering friendly advice about how to make an RFP more
attractive to developers. I'm going to guess the client who prefer
/high-quality skills/ in their service provider over mere /ambition/.

Even "ambitious developers" can get things done cheap, but rarely fast
or good. Heck, that describes my first year of Durpal consulting. I
gave a lot of people some great deals, but if I could do far better
work in half the time rebuilding those same sites today. But then and
now, I wouldn't commit to a fixed timeline that short.

All the Best,

Matt


On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Sean Effel <admin at drupaltherapy.com> wrote:
> This list is a good way to connect clients and developers, but skewering
> RFP authors will weaken this venue for all of us.
>
> What's more, I believe it's unprofessional to scrutinize potential
> projects in a public forum.  If one has doubts about the feasibility of
> an RFP then the choices are to either take it up with the author
> privately or let the opportunity pass on to a more ambitious developer.
>
> Sean Effel
>
>
>
>
> http://www.drupaltherapy.com
> _______________________________________________
> consulting mailing list
> consulting at drupal.org
> http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting
>