From larry at garfieldtech.com Wed Oct 8 15:11:36 2008 From: larry at garfieldtech.com (Larry Garfield) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:11:36 -0500 Subject: [database] More postgres issues Message-ID: http://drupal.org/node/315047 http://drupal.org/node/316095 All of my knowledge of either issue is encapsulated in the issue itself. Josh, think you can lend a hand? --Larry Garfield From jd at commandprompt.com Wed Oct 8 16:01:03 2008 From: jd at commandprompt.com (Joshua Drake) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:01:03 -0700 Subject: [database] More postgres issues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081008090103.1a17b3b0@jd-laptop> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:11:36 -0500 Larry Garfield wrote: > > http://drupal.org/node/315047 O.k. I looked at this one, am I correct in that the only question here is: How does PostgreSQL handle the use of reserved words in SQL? Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ From larry at garfieldtech.com Wed Oct 8 16:05:57 2008 From: larry at garfieldtech.com (Larry Garfield) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:05:57 -0500 Subject: [database] More postgres issues In-Reply-To: <20081008090103.1a17b3b0@jd-laptop> References: <20081008090103.1a17b3b0@jd-laptop> Message-ID: On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:01:03 -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:11:36 -0500 > Larry Garfield wrote: > >> >> http://drupal.org/node/315047 > > O.k. I looked at this one, am I correct in that the only question here > is: How does PostgreSQL handle the use of reserved words in SQL? > > Joshua D. Drake That's the main question, yes. Please respond in the issue so that more than the 5 of us see it. :-) --Larry Garfield From jd at commandprompt.com Wed Oct 8 16:06:59 2008 From: jd at commandprompt.com (Joshua Drake) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:06:59 -0700 Subject: [database] More postgres issues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081008090659.4e350298@jd-laptop> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:11:36 -0500 Larry Garfield wrote: > http://drupal.org/node/316095 And I have answered this. I don't see a problem with using NULL as the php bug work around? Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ From jd at commandprompt.com Wed Oct 8 16:14:32 2008 From: jd at commandprompt.com (Joshua Drake) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:14:32 -0700 Subject: [database] More postgres issues In-Reply-To: References: <20081008090103.1a17b3b0@jd-laptop> Message-ID: <20081008091432.2eccfd85@jd-laptop> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:05:57 -0500 Larry Garfield wrote: > > Joshua D. Drake > > That's the main question, yes. Please respond in the issue so that > more than the 5 of us see it. :-) Done. > > --Larry Garfield > > _______________________________________________ > Database mailing list > Database at drupal.org > http://mail.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/database > -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/