[drupal-devel] Let's accept more interim solutions

Gerhard Killesreiter killesreiter at physik.uni-freiburg.de
Thu Apr 21 14:38:27 UTC 2005

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Syscrusher wrote:

> On Thursday 21 April 2005 09:28, B=C3=A8r Kessels wrote:
> > But to allow "interim" solutions? naah. I think it will bring down our =
> > quality a lot. And it will make our porject a lot harder to maintain, s=
> > our CVS will be in a constant status of no--really-working. Much more t=
> > now.
> I've been reading both sides of this thread with interest, and after thin=
> about it, I'm mostly with B=C3=A8r on this issue. He expresses concerns t=
hat crossed
> my mind from the very first post on this thread.

Yeah. Also, the examples given for what would constitute such interim
solutions were not convincing to say the least.

I still would like to see usefull patches hit core faster than they do
now, though. I've no idea how this coul dbe achieved, though.


More information about the drupal-devel mailing list