[drupal-devel] [bug] User blog feed url is old style

[tangent]

 Project:      Drupal
 Version:      cvs
 Component:    blog.module
 Category:     bug reports
 Priority:     normal
 Assigned to:  Anonymous
 Reported by:  tangent
 Updated by:   tangent
 Status:       patch

RE the patch, it looks fine when I browse the link. It contains no
markup, other than the already existing "link" tag which the patch
modifies. Should I resubmit?

RE url changes, I am not really familiar with legacy.module and only
threw that change in at the last minute when contemplating how to deal
with the url change. It is not clear to me what you're suggesting with
update_97() so you'll have to explain or post an update yourself.

tangent



Previous comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 22, 2005 - 16:49 : tangent

Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/blog.module.feedurl.patch (2.14 KB)

The blog module creates user blog feed urls of the form
"blog/feed/[UID]" while taxonomy follows the new url form of
"taxonomy/term/1/1/feed".

It seems that this should be changed to the new form of
"blog/[UID]/feed" and the attached patch makes this change.

Of course changing this will cause existing feed urls to become invalid
so legacy.module is also patched to redirect old style urls.

Legacy is modified as follows.

"/blog/feed/52" will redirect to "/blog/52/feed"

while

"blog/feed" will not redirect

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 16:41 : Dries

This patch looks corrupts and contains HTML code.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 17:02 : Steven

Note that for URL changes, we should preferably add an update similar to
update_97() and update_98(), which updated the URL aliases. Using an old
alias will end you up in legacy.module, which does a drupal_goto() to a
non-Clean url, which is not very desirable.


-- 
View: http://drupal.org/node/16021
Edit: http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/16021