[drupal-devel] [bug] User blog feed url is old style

tangent drupal-devel at drupal.org
Tue Jan 25 04:18:00 UTC 2005


 Project:      Drupal
 Version:      cvs
 Component:    blog.module
 Category:     bug reports
 Priority:     normal
 Assigned to:  Anonymous
 Reported by:  tangent
 Updated by:   tangent
 Status:       patch
 Attachment:   http://drupal.org/files/issues/updates.blogfeedurl.patch (900 bytes)

I think I see a pattern. My second attachment does not include ".inc" in
the filename while all other patches do. Saving the second file works as
expected while the other attachments are being served up (and marked up
apparently) as HTML. It looks like there is an issue with the project
module or the file management code it relies on.

Attaching the second patch again with no ".inc" in the filename to
confirm my theory.

tangent



Previous comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 22, 2005 - 16:49 : tangent

Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/blog.module.feedurl.patch (2.14 KB)

The blog module creates user blog feed urls of the form
"blog/feed/[UID]" while taxonomy follows the new url form of
"taxonomy/term/1/1/feed".

It seems that this should be changed to the new form of
"blog/[UID]/feed" and the attached patch makes this change.

Of course changing this will cause existing feed urls to become invalid
so legacy.module is also patched to redirect old style urls.

Legacy is modified as follows.

"/blog/feed/52" will redirect to "/blog/52/feed"

while

"blog/feed" will not redirect

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 16:41 : Dries

This patch looks corrupts and contains HTML code.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 17:02 : Steven

Note that for URL changes, we should preferably add an update similar to
update_97() and update_98(), which updated the URL aliases. Using an old
alias will end you up in legacy.module, which does a drupal_goto() to a
non-Clean url, which is not very desirable.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 17:10 : tangent

RE the patch, it looks fine when I browse the link. It contains no
markup, other than the already existing "link" tag which the patch
modifies. Should I resubmit?

RE url changes, I am not really familiar with legacy.module and only
threw that change in at the last minute when contemplating how to deal
with the url change. It is not clear to me what you're suggesting with
update_97() so you'll have to explain or post an update yourself.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 17:27 : tangent

Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/blog_feedurl.patch (2.14 KB)

Resubmitting same patch with a different filename (in case the problem
is with the attachment system).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 23:07 : tangent

Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/updates.inc.blogfeedurl.patch (900 bytes)

RE the url updates, after rereading and looking around a bit I've
figured out what is being requested. I'm attaching a patch which adds
update_120() which has the intention of updating url alias' for blog
urls. I haven't tested it though.

The original patch was changed to HTML somehow/somewhere that I cannot
determine. Apologies. The second patch seems fine.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 24, 2005 - 23:11 : tangent

Attachment: http://drupal.org/files/issues/updates.inc.blogfeedurl2.patch (900 bytes)

The previous patch seems to have been converted to HTML as well though
I've confirmed that my local file is definitely a plain patch. Did the
file attachment system get hosed?

Trying to attach it again.

-- 
View: http://drupal.org/node/16021
Edit: http://drupal.org/project/comments/add/16021





More information about the drupal-devel mailing list