Image handling settings (was: [drupal-devel] Re: [drupal:dries]
Drupal-Devel at iStyledThis.nl
Tue Mar 22 09:12:07 UTC 2005
Op 22-mrt-05 om 10:05 heeft Tim Altman het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:12:21 +0100, Stefan Nagtegaal
> <Drupal-Devel at iStyledThis.nl> wrote:
>> Op 22-mrt-05 om 8:49 heeft Tim Altman het volgende geschreven:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:49:54 +0100, Stefan Nagtegaal
>>> <Drupal-Devel at iStyledThis.nl> wrote:
>>>> Op 21-mrt-05 om 22:25 heeft drupal-devel at drupal.org het volgende
>>>>> User: dries Branch: HEAD Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:25:49 +0000
>>>>> Modified files:
>>>>> /modules system.module
>>>>> Log message:
>>>>> - Patch #18093 by Junyor: clean up handling of image toolkit
>>>>> code in absence of
>>>>> any toolkits.
>>>> This is not uniform/consistent to the other code we currently have.
>> When there is no image toolkit available, why would you want to see
>> the option to select all this?? We do not do that anywhere in drupal,
>> only with the "Clean url"-option..
> I understand where you're coming from, but try to think like a user
> or documentor. Vanishing options and making people look all over the
> place for information is not good UI and very hard to document.
> Tim Altman
IMO it's not at hard at all.. When we keep on the approach that all
notices and server apgrade possibilities goes into WATCHDOG_NOTICE
there _is_ a central place to look into to get a maximum usable
One glance at the 'notices'-page of the watchdog will give you
everything you need to see what could be done to accomplish the goal of
something you want to be able of..
That is - imo - better than struggling through all the settings pages
and see why such a function doesn't work..
More information about the drupal-devel