5.0 and or 4.8 (was Re: [development] Drupal x.x.0 freeze date)
chris at tinpixel.com
Sun Apr 30 17:34:03 UTC 2006
Khalid B wrote:
> Side point: I have stated before that 4.7 should have been 5.0, since
> we have significant APIs and functionality changes. The decision to stay
> with 4.7 and not call it 5.0 had good reasons (too late to call it
> How about using a code name for the next release and not just a number?
> For example, if we call the next release any meaningless name such as
> Gizmo, or Orca, we can then decide before we release it to call it 4.8 or
> 5.0 depending on what went in.
Excellent idea, and one that I support. I like my branch numbers to have
meaning. As a bonus, the press loves the cachet of code names. :-)
More information about the development