[development] links best practices (was Re: internal link filter
rz10 at cornell.edu
Sat Aug 5 02:45:43 UTC 2006
On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Khalid B wrote:
> I agree with Morbus on this .... (mark the day ...)
> For this very reason:
>> Doing so, even internally, is a creation of what appears to be
>> a new protocol, even though it's actually not.
> A new "file" format is more acceptable ...
Can you elaborate? What do you mean by a new "file" format? Sorry
for my ignorance about URNs.
Btw, were you agreeing about using internal:node/4, or just about
*not* using internal://node/4?
More information about the development