[development] Re: InnoDB and accesslog/ watchdog
dries.buytaert at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 14:46:28 UTC 2006
On 14 Aug 2006, at 16:27, Ken Rickard wrote:
> > Is there anybody who prefers innodb for
> > logging tables and would prefer to not change them to myisam?
> Yes. At a large-scale site, InnoDB is much preferred. Our MySQL
> admin is working on a patchfile for database.4.1.mysql that
> installs log tables as InnoDB by default for our installations.
A patch for this?
ALTER TABLE accesslog TYPE='InnoDB';
Dries Buytaert :: http://www.buytaert.net/
More information about the development