[development] proposal for issues: post 4.7 marker

Greg Knaddison greg.knaddison at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 14:43:52 UTC 2006

On 1/9/06, Bèr Kessels <ber at webschuur.com> wrote:
> Op maandag 9 januari 2006 11:16, schreef Piotr Krukowiecki:
> > There's already 'postponed' status.
> I wrote:
> " I know we have "postponed" but that is hardly used. And more: postponed does
> not indicate untill when it is postponed. It also cannot co-exist with "patch
> (code needs work)" and so statuses. "

Exactly - this is why we need a "target milestone" field so we can say
"targetted to 4.7+" and have a status of "patch (code needs work)" so
that information about the availability of code doesn't get lost.

And I know talk is cheap and code is gold - I'll check for/add issues
for these items today and assign myself.


More information about the development mailing list