Weights are not the solution? Re: [development] altering an alteredform

Bèr Kessels ber at webschuur.com
Fri Jun 9 19:10:29 UTC 2006

Op vrijdag 9 juni 2006 16:08, schreef Nedjo Rogers:
> Maybe a simple (?) solution would be to register not all hooks but only
> their dependencies.

Sounds like this will fix Vladimirs problem (complexity not worth the gain, 
valid point!) and the current issue of our hooks not being flexible. 

If you add this in a .install, or some other  run-once file, you can still 
change this, maybe even trough some exotic (as in: advanced users only) UI 
Only a few modules, and the various distros (install profiles) need to care 
about this one-time registration of hooks. And when they do not register 
anything, nothing is lost either. Then the default Drupal way (run them 
alphabetically) will work as it always did. 

| Bèr Kessels | webschuur.com | website development |
| Jabber & Google Talk: ber at jabber.webschuur.com
| http://bler.webschuur.com | http://www.webschuur.com |

Drupal upgrade repareert kritiek beveiligingslek:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20060609/45e57227/attachment.pgp

More information about the development mailing list