[development] Re: 18 critical bugs left
greg.knaddison at gmail.com
Tue Mar 7 14:04:44 UTC 2006
On 3/7/06, Karoly Negyesi <karoly at negyesi.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 10:51:58 +0100, Dries Buytaert
> <dries.buytaert at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > If there were hundreds of critical bugs, we'd have a problem. For
> >> > now, it is fairly easy to review 18 critical bugs and to re-
> >> > categorize those that have the wrong priority.
> >> that would hold true if you would like at the problem from the
> >> "critcical bugs pov".
> >> however, how many of the 1000's "normal" bugs would qualify as critical?
> No thousands of normal bugs, last I checked there were less (far less)
> than a thousand.
Currently 371 critical+normal - and I agree that most reporters
debating between critical and normal submit it as critical. There are
occasionally the reverse cases (e.g. 13148, 52182, etc.) but they are
More information about the development