dopry at thing.net
Wed Mar 29 23:07:37 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 00:57 +0200, Adrian Rossouw wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2006, at 11:02 PM, Jeff Eaton wrote:
> > Far better, IMO, to explore a more robust relationships system that
> > *encompasses* taxonomy-style metadata and book-style relationships (as
> > well as other stuff). There are a couple of projects along these lines
> > already. If there's talk of revisiting something as fundamental as
> > taxonomy, make the project worth the effort.
> Welcome to the 'we need a generalised relationship API' club.
> We're going to start putting together a newsletter.
at the very least we need cards.
More information about the development