[development] new CVS branch/tag conventions (was Re: tagadelic 'backport' for 4.7)

[Chad Phillips -- Apartment Lines]

On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Khalid B wrote:

>
>> 1) "DRUPAL-4-7--1" and "DRUPAL-4-7--1-0"
>>
>> 2) "DRUPAL-4-7-V-1" and "DRUPAL-4-7-V-1-0"
>>
>> 3) "DRUPAL-4-7-R-1" and "DRUPAL-4-7-R-1-0"
>>
>> 4) "DRUPAL-4-7-REV-1" and "DRUPAL-4-7-REV-1-0"
>>
>> 5) "DRUPAL-4-7_1" and "DRUPAL-4-7_1-0"  (just for comparison, this  
>> isn't
>> a contender)
>
> I think #4 is the least ambiguous. the -- is the most concise, but  
> I am afraid
> it would not be obvious to new Drupal users, or non-technical users.

i second this opinion -- it adds three more characters to the name,  
but makes it totally obvious to any developer--even those with no  
drupal experience.

+1 to #4  :)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20061004/e316fb15/attachment.htm