[development] code names for core releases?
merlin at logrus.com
Wed Sep 20 00:23:27 UTC 2006
Richard Archer wrote:
> If we must use a name, HEAD is just fine.
Once again, at the risk of repeating myself, the reason HEAD is at issue
is that HEAD today is not HEAD in 1 year, and when looking at old
documents, something referring to HEAD is referring to what is
essentially some unknown codebase.
So it's "just fine" if and only if this argument doesn't matter to you.
More information about the development