[development] duplication and input format modules
Sean Robertson
seanr at ngpsoftware.com
Thu Aug 9 15:04:35 UTC 2007
Such a search block should also have a drop down for the version, IMO.
Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:06:51 +0200, Dries Buytaert <dries.buytaert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree. A lot of these groups, like the contributed-module-ideas
>> group (to some extend), are quick ugly hacks to work around an
>> underlying problem. I'd prefer to see people spend their time on
>> improving the underlying problem (i.e. module findability). It keeps
>> amazing me why people aren't a little bit more critic towards these
>> kind of hacks. I guess other people will fix the module findability
>> problem then ...
>
> My apologies to dww before I even say anything... :-)
>
> Would it be difficult, once the search module is back on, to offer somewhere a search box that is pre-set to only search project nodes? I have found in the past that doing an Advanced search for my keyword(s) restricted to "project" nodes (shouldn't that be Project now?) is a surprisingly good way to track down a module. It's a PITA to have to do, though, especially when d.o is slow. Could we have some sort of optional-default-off "project search" block that just has that restriction pre-set? It doesn't need to be fancy, just forward to the normal search system for results.
>
> And while we're on the subject, I'll reiterate my previous point that for 99% of all users, including those with CVS access, something in a person's sandbox does not exist.
>
> --Larry Garfield
>
--
Sean Robertson
Web Developer
NGP Software, Inc.
seanr at ngpsoftware.com
(202) 686-9330
http://www.ngpsoftware.com
More information about the development
mailing list