[development] adoption for 'abandoned' modules?

[Darren Oh]

On Jan 19, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Jason Flatt wrote:

> There are many modules that don't need a whole lot of modification,  
> and if the release cycles are 6-12 months, it would be easy for a  
> module that is maintained to get incorrectly flagged.

In that case, we should add the following two conditions to determine  
whether a module is being maintained: 1) Are there active issues more  
than three months old, and if so, 2) has the maintainer responded to  
any issues within the last three months?