[development] Referential integrity -- finally?

[adrian rossouw]

On 24 Jan 2007, at 5:20 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:

>
> The 'database scheme definition' vs 'standard query language' (or  
> 'data manipulation language') argument make sense to me -- although  
> it would be great if you had pointers to references.
>
> Either way, I'm willing to reverse my position on creating database  
> abstraction functions for create or altering SQL tables -- but not  
> to build SELECT/UPDATE/INSERT queries.

Great news.

Perhaps we should contact the people handling the different DBMS  
ports. ?

Also, this might make sqllite more easily implemented. I believe it  
doesn't even have an alter mechanism, and
you need to use application code to recreate tables and the like.  
http://code.jenseng.com/db/


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20070124/7518cf82/attachment.htm