[development] Referential integrity -- finally?
adrian at bryght.com
Wed Jan 24 17:01:36 UTC 2007
On 24 Jan 2007, at 5:20 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:
> The 'database scheme definition' vs 'standard query language' (or
> 'data manipulation language') argument make sense to me -- although
> it would be great if you had pointers to references.
> Either way, I'm willing to reverse my position on creating database
> abstraction functions for create or altering SQL tables -- but not
> to build SELECT/UPDATE/INSERT queries.
Perhaps we should contact the people handling the different DBMS
Also, this might make sqllite more easily implemented. I believe it
doesn't even have an alter mechanism, and
you need to use application code to recreate tables and the like.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the development