[development] Listen

[dmitri]

On Jul 3, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:

>
> On 03 Jul 2007, at 21:16, Moshe Weitzman wrote:
>>> We should also change the perception that RTBC means "a core  
>>> committer needs to look at this".  When a patch is RTBC, it still  
>>> means that everyone needs to look at it, and that's part of the  
>>> reason why many patches are still in the RTBC queue.  I'll try to  
>>> be faster to send back these to the "code needs (better) review"  
>>> status, if that helps. Ultimately, this is something everyone can  
>>> help with.  If a patch is in RTBC for too long, it probably means  
>>> it could use more quality reviews.
>>
>> Yes, it would help a lot if committers would process this queue  
>> quickly. Thanks.
>
> FYI, we're down to two pages of issues marked RTBC.  More queue  
> wrangling tomorrow.
>
BTW Dries, thanks so much... so patch review day had a cause...
/me is happy
> --
> Dries Buytaert  ::  http://www.buytaert.net/
>