[development] Default to InnoDB
gordon at heydon.com.au
Mon Jun 4 04:14:22 UTC 2007
I like the idea, but I do not like forcing it onto everyone. What would
be good is during the install process we can select which type of table
we want to use if it is mysql.
Maybe even have a page with a config of the default value to use.
I don't think this will be too hard esp since we have the schema api now.
Khalid Baheyeldin wrote:
> On 6/3/07, *David Strauss* <david at fourkitchens.com
> <mailto:david at fourkitchens.com>> wrote:
> Many discount web hosts (like Dreamhost) support InnoDB but don't
> configure it as a default.
> Most shared hosts support it recently.
> What do people think about using InnoDB as the default,
> Big -1 from me.
> We used to have Engine=MyISAM everywhere in the CREATE statements.
> We went thru an exercise to purge them all so that we are engine agnostic.
> Defaulting back to a specific engine is a step back.
> or at least an option during installation?
> That I can live with.
> The only way I know to install Drupal with InnoDB is by modifying
> my.cnf, which requires root access.
> An option at install time, such as a drop down list of engines that
> are supported on the server, and selecting one is more appropriate.
> It will require preg stuff to change the engine. Or using the new
> schema, we can add that more elegantly (not sure how hard would
> it be, but can't be that hard).
> 2bits.com <http://2bits.com>
> Drupal development, customization and consulting.
More information about the development