On 5/22/2007 9:49:54 PM, Larry Garfield (larry at garfieldtech.com) wrote: > For the date itself, it couldn't be before 2008 sometime. I'm thinking 1 > > January or 1 April, but that depends on the other projects involved and > how > long it takes to agree on a date/version. TBD. Not sure April 1st is the best idea for a date... ;) Michelle