[development] Modules that integrate non-GPL PHP apps violate the GPL.
crystalcube at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 6 15:40:25 UTC 2007
--- Cog Rusty <cog.rusty at gmail.com> wrote:
> Was the Joomla SMF bridge licensed under GPL in the
> first place?
> Reading the announcement it seems it was not.
What will licensing bridge under GPL achieve. Wouldn't
that pass the buck to bridge ? If bridge is licensed
under GPL then connecting bridge (GPL) with SMF (
non-GPL) is same situation whats the difference ?
in any case another thread also highlights the
discussion between SMF and FSF
this very questioned has been asked and answered by
from that thread
>> If the glue does have to be GPL (or LGPL), could
the second script be
>> then legally licensed under a non-compatible
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
More information about the development