[development] Modules that integrate non-GPL PHP apps violate the GPL.

Vivek Puri crystalcube at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 6 15:40:25 UTC 2007

--- Cog Rusty <cog.rusty at gmail.com> wrote:
> Was the Joomla SMF bridge licensed under GPL in the
> first place?
> Reading the announcement it seems it was not.

What will licensing bridge under GPL achieve. Wouldn't
that pass the buck to bridge ? If bridge is licensed
under GPL then  connecting bridge (GPL) with SMF (
non-GPL) is same situation whats the difference ?

in any case another thread also highlights the
discussion between SMF and FSF

this very questioned has been asked and answered by

from that thread
>> If the glue does have to be GPL (or LGPL), could
the second script be
>> then legally licensed under a non-compatible



____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 

More information about the development mailing list