[development] Modules that integrate non-GPL PHP apps violate the GPL.
earnie at users.sourceforge.net
Fri Sep 7 13:16:25 UTC 2007
Quoting Cog Rusty <cog.rusty at gmail.com>:
> No difference at all if we find that the GPL license text attached to
> a bridge module invalidates itself. But does it, and according to
> which point of the license text? That is my question.
The point which is exampled by the original BSD is the one that the
smf module violates because of restrictions the Simple Machines license
places , and the fact that the module becomes a combined work
since it includes source code from both for you to use the differing
P.S. I am neither for or against the GPL but when I create something
new I do not choose it because its viral nature removes a freedom I do
not wish to remove. However, I do abide by it if others have chosen it
for their works and will at that time promote it.
More information about the development