[development] Arquitectura Drupal

[Victor Kane]

Oh, I beg your pardon, I thought we were having a polite discussion.

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Larry Garfield <larry at garfieldtech.com>
wrote:

>
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:14:07 -0300, "Victor Kane" <victorkane at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Quick English translation: Above and beyond classifying Drupal in one or
> > another design pattern in the strictest sense, we speak of MVC in
> relation
> > to Drupal because of its clean separation of data persistence and forms
> > (model), logic (http request and response, or Drupal page life-cycle)
> and
> > view (the HTML that is returned to the browser), and that there are many
> > API's and opportunities to override in a clean fashion.
>
> Which is wrong.  3-part separation does not imply MVC.  MVC is one
> specific 3-part separation that is poorly suited to the web.  WebMVC/MVC2 is
> a stupidly named architecture more properly termed "Rails-style", since most
> of them are inspired by Ruby on Rails' misuse of the term "MVC".  I
> personally happen to think it is a fairly bad architecture, too, but that's
> more subjective.
>
> See the previously posted link for more details, and please stop calling
> Drupal something it is not.
>
> --Larry Garfield
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20080423/475da574/attachment.htm