[development] Time to take away RTBC from every Joe
Omar Abdel-Wahab
owahab at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 09:07:09 UTC 2008
+1 for what Angela said.
I also see we might need to document somewhere that marking a patch as
RTBC is a responsibility towards that patch in terms of testing,
reviewing, etc...
We can't have rules for everything, sometimes pointing out problems
and mistakes is a better approach.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Angela Byron <drupal-devel at webchick.net> wrote:
> Karoly Negyesi wrote:
>
> > Onwards, I would like to see a small handful people (me not
> > necessarily included!) to be able to RTBC core patches. As we go on,
> > more and more people will misunderstand what this means. A nice
> > pyramid, a few people on top deciding the patches, a few more culling
> > the flood of patches for them. As there is already a permission for
> > this, a little hacking (which I am willing to do) surely would make it
> > possible to have it just for project 3060.
>
> No thanks.
>
> My guess is that this small handful of people who'd have this permission
> are the same small handful of people who are already doing a bazillion
> other things in core, and suddenly moving issues to RTBC would become
> their full-time jobs (or at least part-time).
>
> Further, instead of these "problem" users changing the status
> themselves, they now start PMing and e-mailing this small handful of
> people "RTBC my patch!!" which I can tell you right now is going to
> cause even further grating of nerves. :P
>
> A better approach? Education. Document the best practices, *teach*
> problem users what the proper usage of "RTBC" is, and they'll teach
> others, and so on and so on.
>
> -Angie
>
>
More information about the development
mailing list