[development] Slow down with the official releases of contrib already, ok? ; )

Adrian Rossouw adrian at bryght.com
Fri May 30 14:42:03 UTC 2008

On 30 May 2008, at 4:35 PM, Darrel O'Pry wrote:

> <constructive criticism>The -dev extra is still a little limiting. a  
> timestamp would almost be better. I personally feel users who want  
> to follow head will be using CVS, and those who don't knwo how to  
> use CVS but want to test are using -dev.tar.gz. A timestamp would be  
> a solid indicator as to which -dev release they're using since it is  
> a moving target.</contructive criticism>
i'm sitting in the same situation right now.

I would like to create weekly releases from HEAD on a project i am  
working on right now.
-dev has too many semantics related to it for my purposes.

More information about the development mailing list