[development] Certify Drupal for use in Government (US) Projects

Drupal Developer lapurd at gmail.com
Wed Oct 1 07:40:17 UTC 2008

Wow, I would like everybody to notice something right here.

In the message I reply to, Matt Farina said:

"The security team handles things in a tight way. When something is 
reported it's not opened up to the world. If the issue is valid it's 
handled behind closed doors until a fix and advisory is sent out." /end 
of citation/

I thought that Drupal is an open community of open source developers 
working under GPL license.
Does it mean that ALL issues have to be openly reported to all community 
for everybody to review?
Don't you all think that handling security issues behind closed doors 
until a fix and advisory will be sent out is sound  more like corporate 
way of thinking on a way to develop something proprietary?

I'm very concern about that and invite everybody to collaborate on this one.

Does Matt represent a real situation at this matter in Drupal 
development community?
If not, then I'm sure that many people would like to know exactly what 
the process is for handling security issues from the moment they have 
been reported?

Thanks in advance,

matt at mattfarina.com wrote:
> Jon,
> Thanks for your interest in this. I'm interested in this as well.
> Some of their concerns seem to be over some misconceptions that might 
> help to be cleared up.
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong but drupal 4.0 was 10 major releases 
> ago. 100 + advisories over 10 major releases isn't as many as the 3 
> which the numbering might look like. Before drupal 5 the major 
> releases were point releases and not full number releases. On top of 
> that, the security advisories cover contributed modules and have 
> included other libraries used by drupal modules, such as getID3.
> The security team handles things in a tight way. When something is 
> reported it's not opened up to the world. If the issue is valid it's 
> handled behind closed doors until a fix and advisory is sent out. 
> Those advisories come out on Wednesdays so they can immediately be 
> acted on.
> I would be very curious as to what it would take to certification as 
> well as their concerns.
> Matt
> Quoting Jon Saints <saintsjd at gmail.com>:
>> On a recent project for the US government, half way through the 
>> development
>> process, our work was stopped by a government security review which said
>> that Drupal (and open source software in general) is not suitable for 
>> use in
>> government projects that house personal information due to security
>> concerns.
>> Because our project had been approved by higher ups within the 
>> department,
>> we were paid for our work up to that point and asked to stop.  Now, 
>> its up
>> to the tax payers to foot a much larger bill for other developers to
>> implement a proprietary and more "secure" (or secretive) solution.
>> The "transparency" of the Drupal project was one of the government's big
>> objections.  In their eyes, disclosing and fixing securit holes in a 
>> timely
>> manner, is not the same thing as security.  They pointed out the 100+
>> security disclosures since drupal 4.0 as a reason that the system 
>> could not
>> be used.  We noted that all these disclosures where quickly 
>> addressed, but
>> that did not seem to matter.
>> I notice other governments around the world are using Drupal with great
>> success and savings to citizens:
>> http://buytaert.net/new-zealand-government-using-drupal
>> The standards we would need to meet with drupal are:
>> http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SMA/fisma/index.html
>> My questions are the following:
>>  - Have any other developers run into this cerfication problem before?
>>  - Is anyone in the drupal community currently working to get Drupal
>> certified for use in US Government projects?
>>  - Does anyone know exactly what cerfication would require from a
>> development standpoint?
>> If there is interest in investigating this type of certification 
>> further,
>> let me know. NIST, the department that certifies software, is just 
>> down the
>> road from me.  I could go investigate further.
>> Thanks
>> Jon 

More information about the development mailing list