[development] Announcing DRUPAL-7-0-UNSTABLE-2

Gábor Hojtsy gabor at hojtsy.hu
Mon Oct 13 17:16:24 UTC 2008

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Nathaniel Catchpole
<catch56 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Therefore, if an API changes between UNSTABLE-1 and UNSTABLE-2 - then we
> should document the 6.x - 7.x upgrade in UNSTABLE-2 as 'this is the most
> recent unstable release where this particular API was changed'. If
> UNSTABLE-2 is out, no-one should be trying to upgrade to UNSTABLE-1 at all.
> If you're upgrading from UNSTABLE-1 to UNSTABLE-2, then the fact that (in
> this example) permissions changes are there again, means you ought to be
> able to work out what to do.

You say we should just move these sections around as if no hook_perm()
change would have happened in UNSTABLE_1?


More information about the development mailing list