[development] Body and teaser as fields
victorkane at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 13:21:22 UTC 2009
If there are any improvements at all to be gained here, it is that there
should be NO default Drupal content types, except maybe by way of example.
Therefore, _nothing_ should be assumed about sub-class terms, they will be
up to the end user in each case.
So rather than argue in favor or against "post" as opposed to whatever,
something like "content" (i.e. generic) is what should go.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Syscrusher <syscrusher at 4th.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 06:41 +0100, Ronald Ashri wrote:
> > For example a page could be a Title and Content, but a story would be
> > Title, Post (a more blog-like name),
> I respectfully disagree. "Content" is a nice generic term, and I think
> that the same field should be called the same thing across all the
> standard Drupal-default node types. Also, many Drupal sites are not
> blogs nor blog-like sites, so we should not assume that blog-ish
> terminology will be familiar to all Drupal content creators.
> Kind regards,
> Syscrusher <syscrusher at 4th.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the development